Welcome to Buster's Blog

Irregular commentary on whatever's on my mind -- politics, sports, current events, and life in general. After twenty years of writing business and community newsletters, fifteen years of fantasy baseball newsletters, and two years of email "columns", this is, I suppose, the inevitable result: the awful conceit that someone might actually care to read what I have to say. Posts may be added often, rarely, or never again. As always, my mood and motivation are unpredictable.

Buster Gammons















Monday, September 28, 2015

Selling Sickness


Here's a collection of vowels and consonants arranged into melodious, pleasant-sounding groupings, typically in three syllables:

Epanova, Jublia, Otezla, Afrezza, Farxiga, Vogelxo, Belsomra, Zerbaxa, Harvoni, Movantik, Osphena, Invokana, Sovaldi, Eliquis, Linzess, Lyrica, Xeljanz, Xarelto, Intermexxo, Soliris, Pradaxa, Prolia, Victoza, Dulera, Vimovo, Prevnar  

What do all these mean?  Literally, nothing.  And intentionally so.  What do they do?  Who knows?  But they sure sound nice in a TV ad.  They are brand names of a few of the prescription drugs introduced in the past five years.  



Prescription drugs are the 3rd-highest element in U.S. health care costs.  One hundred or more new drugs are approved by the FDA every year.  Every year.  Is medical science discovering that many brand new maladies each year?  How many different things can possibly go wrong with a human being?

Once upon a time, doctors and drug companies agreed that direct-to-consumer drug advertising was a bad idea.  The average consumer couldn't possibly evaluate a drug's claims or appropriateness.  And doctors cringed at the idea of patients badgering them for specific prescriptions.

But throught the 1980's and 1990's, the FDA steadily and dramatically relaxed the rules for pharmaceutical advertising.  Today, the Nielsen Co. estimates that across the spectrum of cable and bradcast, there is an average of 100 drug ads every hour of every day on American TV.  And every one of 'em ends with, "Ask your doctor if _____ is right for you."

And a whole lot of people do just that.  The ads work, prescriptions are written, drugs are sold, and we all pay to one extent or another.

Are all these new drugs improving our health outcomes in any measurable way?  Hell no.  (How many times can a sleeping pill really be "improved"?)  Are all the new drugs improving Big Pharma's bottom line?  Hell yes!

Pharmaceutical companies are shamelessly profiteering by selling sickness to a gullible public.
____________________________________


Ass-wipe of the Month
This rant was spurred by one Martin Shkreli, ass-wipe former hedgefund manager who bought a pharmaceutical company and, overnight, jacked the price of an essential infection-treatment drug from $13.50 per pill to $750!  When he drew heavy criticism from all corners, he said he "couldn't care less" and that the $750 price tag was "not excessive at all."



3 comments:

  1. Here's two more new ones for you, Buster: Opdivo and Namzaric. I noticed two TV ads for them last night on prime time network broadcasts. Opdivo is for a very specific type of lung cancer. The fine print says that those who use it live an average of just 3 months longer than those on other treatments. Three months -- big deal. Namzaric is for Alzheimer's. Their ad opens with the immediate disclaimer "There is no cure for Alzheimer's, and evidence that Namzaric slows the disease process." So what the hell does Namzaric do? Like every other Alzheimer's drug, it claims that it "may relieve certain symptoms." Or more probably, it may not. Can't believe the FDA approves this snake oil. One does very little and the other does nothing. What do the ads cost? What does the drug cost? It's a racket.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you meant "no evidence." I'll watch for the ad. Thanks for the comment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi nice Post written by you. It is amazing and wonderful to visit your site. Thank a ton for such a nice post.
    Invokana lawsuit

    ReplyDelete