The original Gerry-mander, Massachusetts, 1812 |
The amendment would give the minority party some small leverage. It would establish a seven-member Redistricitng Commission which would have at least two minority party members. If all seven would agree to a new map, the districts would be good for ten years. But if it were not unanimous, the map would last just four years.
It would be a minor improvement, but an improvement nonetheless -- an outrageously partisan gerrymandering job (like what we have now) would be up for review in four years, not ten. (Unfortunately, it's not the big-idea, genuine reform of the 12-appointed-member, non-partisan, judicially-supervised commission stupidly rejected by Ohio voters in 2012.)
It's baby steps, but we should approve the amendment, I guess. Such is politics. Believe it or not, it has a lot of bipartisan support.
I still like Buster's simple approach for federal redistricitng, suggested in this post from 2011:
http://bustergammons.blogspot.com/2011/09/buster-takes-on-redistricting.html
No comments:
Post a Comment